Page 1 of 3

170 B with less than 1300 hours TTAF

Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 11:41 pm
by N2255D
Found this '52B at the flyout from Camden last weekend. The plane hasn't flown in 40 years. The black tape spots are from the airport taping lights to it and using it for a Christmas ornament. It's still bare metal and the corrosion under the wings is unbelievable. The whole thing inside and out is destroyed. Looks like the only usable part would be the data plate, if it's still there. didn't open the door to check. I was afraid it would fall off or never close again. They said the owner always refused to sell when contacted :roll:
IMG_0344 (640x478).jpg
IMG_0343 (640x478).jpg

Re: 170 B with less than 1300 hours TTAF

Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:36 am
by GAHorn
Looks like the tires hold air.

Re: 170 B with less than 1300 hours TTAF

Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 3:01 am
by johneeb
Image
Does it really have a sun shade in the windshield? Oh maybe that is the headliner hanging down!

Re: 170 B with less than 1300 hours TTAF

Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 3:56 am
by mit
It flew in, it can fly out, all it takes is time and money!

Re: 170 B with less than 1300 hours TTAF

Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 2:29 pm
by edbooth
Is this the one over at Timmonsville? I think I looked at that plane about 20 years ago. So sad.

Re: 170 B with less than 1300 hours TTAF

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:40 pm
by MoonlightVFR
There may be more value in this aircraft than it appears.

I sometimes eat at an Applebees restaurant in St Louis that has aviation artifacts hanging on the wall for ambiance/decoration.

My favorite table has 170 doors hanging on the wall. I spoke to the manager about removing the door temporary since I was interested in the interior door handle and latching mechanism. He turned my request down!

The explanation was that Applebees merely leases the object d Art not owns. He understood that their provider had many warehouses filled with stuff to lease to restaurants.

I am curious about the aircraft pictured , what is it's N number? I saw a similar 170 at Marked Tree, Arkansas 30 years ago, some one purchased it and did complete rebuild.

Regards

Re: 170 B with less than 1300 hours TTAF

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 3:33 pm
by DaveF
Looks like it's N8375A .

Re: 170 B with less than 1300 hours TTAF

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 1:47 am
by N2255D
edbooth wrote:Is this the one over at Timmonsville? I think I looked at that plane about 20 years ago. So sad.
Don't know were my last response to the question disappeared to, but yes this is the one at Timmonsville. It's probably moved a few times since you've seen it but never under it's own power.

Re: 170 B with less than 1300 hours TTAF

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 2:40 pm
by edbooth
I thought it was. when I saw it, they would have had to cut down some trees and bushes to get it out. :cry:

Re: 170 B with less than 1300 hours TTAF

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 7:47 pm
by russfarris
I'm flying the '57 172 from Charlotte to Wilmington Friday to visit my daughter and Timmonsville, SC is right on the way. It's located at Huggins Field (58J, correct?) I really want to check this out, it seems like a very original airplane. Not as a project, obviously! Russ Farris

Re: 170 B with less than 1300 hours TTAF

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 8:41 pm
by N2255D
russfarris wrote:I'm flying the '57 172 from Charlotte to Wilmington Friday to visit my daughter and Timmonsville, SC is right on the way. It's located at Huggins Field (58J, correct?) I really want to check this out, it seems like a very original airplane. Not as a project, obviously! Russ Farris
That's the place. Yes it looks totally original to me. Still has Goodyear brakes. The only thing that doesn't look original is the Large numbers someone painted on the side of the fuselage. They (Large numbers) are almost gone but the rest of the paint is holding up pretty well. I originally took the pictures in case some one was looking for a 52 paint scheme

Re: 170 B with less than 1300 hours TTAF

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 8:44 pm
by N2255D
Aryana wrote:C'mon...that'll buff out in an afternoon! :lol:
When your ready let me know and I'll come and watch :lol:

Re: 170 B with less than 1300 hours TTAF

Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 12:03 am
by blueldr
The FAA registry has it as a C-170B and the cowling makes it a '52 model.

Re: 170 B with less than 1300 hours TTAF

Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 4:33 am
by russfarris
N2255D wrote:
russfarris wrote:I'm flying the '57 172 from Charlotte to Wilmington Friday to visit my daughter and Timmonsville, SC is right on the way. It's located at Huggins Field (58J, correct?) I really want to check this out, it seems like a very original airplane. Not as a project, obviously! Russ Farris
That's the place. Yes it looks totally original to me. Still has Goodyear brakes. The only thing that doesn't look original is the Large numbers someone painted on the side of the fuselage. They (Large numbers) are almost gone but the rest of the paint is holding up pretty well. I originally took the pictures in case some one was looking for a 52 paint scheme
Yep - the 12 inch fuselage numbers requirement was instigated by the first FAA administrator "Pete" Quesada, in 1958. There was a four year phase in. Piper applied the 12 inch numbers to the 1958 models, Beech in 1960 and Cessna finally in the fall of 1961 with the intro of the 1962 models. On January 1, 1962 ALL civil aircraft with the exception of large turbine airliners were required to make the change. I've seen a number of original paint airplanes including my 1946 Stinson that had the 12 inch numbers added, including that beautiful 182 at OSH this year. The FAA relented around 1974/75 for a time and allowed the small numbers on the tail again but without wing numbers. No need to go into the confusing current regs on this! I'm looking forward to checking this 170B out, I owned a 52 for many years.

Russ Farris

Re: 170 B with less than 1300 hours TTAF

Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 2:53 am
by N2255D
russfarris wrote:I'm flying the '57 172 from Charlotte to Wilmington Friday to visit my daughter and Timmonsville, SC is right on the way. It's located at Huggins Field (58J, correct?) I really want to check this out, it seems like a very original airplane. Not as a project, obviously! Russ Farris
Russ.
Did you ever get a look at this plane?