170A VS. 170B

A place to relax and discuss flying topics.

Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher

Post Reply
lovetaildraggers
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 5:10 pm

170A VS. 170B

Post by lovetaildraggers »

Can anyone tell me how much difference there is in the performance between the 170A and the 170B.
Harold Holiman
Posts: 579
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 1:54 pm

Re: 170A VS. 170B

Post by Harold Holiman »

I had a 170A. Personally, except for the effects of the larger flaps, I don't think there was any noticable difference in speed or performance. The A might have a slight advantage in speed, but very little.
Harold Holiman
Member # 893 (11/73)
Past Director, TIC170A
Former Owner of;
C170A N9027A
C172N N1764V
C180 N92CP
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21017
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: 170A VS. 170B

Post by GAHorn »

The B uses slightly shorter runways and is VERY slightly more stable due to larger flaps and dihedral.
An active imagination may suggest that dihedral detracts from cruise speed.....but an equally valid
argument can be made that the additional stability of dihedral reduces control inputs, thereby
improving the speed of a B model.
Cessna made no claim other than the B was an improvement in handling and field length performance.
If you are torn between two desireable models......consider condition, pricing, ....and that B models
have greater availability of many airframe parts.
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
User avatar
blueldr
Posts: 4442
Joined: Thu May 02, 2002 3:16 am

Re: 170A VS. 170B

Post by blueldr »

Don't forget that the control cableing allows an extended baggage compartment on the "B" madel for those interested in the extra space for camping gear, etc.
That was an important factor for me.
BL
User avatar
Brad Brady
Posts: 745
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 2:54 am

Re: 170A VS. 170B

Post by Brad Brady »

If I could push a "like button like on Facebook" I'd just agree with George....Hey an Idea for the forums... :D
lovetaildraggers
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 5:10 pm

Re: 170A VS. 170B

Post by lovetaildraggers »

Thats exactly what I need to know. I like the extra baggage area for gear and the shorter take off distance. The A models seem to be a little cheeper but I usually choose the most expensive toys anyway. Thank you all for your imput.
lovetaildraggers
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 5:10 pm

Re: 170A VS. 170B

Post by lovetaildraggers »

Correction: I said shorter take off distance but after reading it again, I imagine that he ment getting into shorter runways with the larger flaps or perhaps, both. I guess the main things is getting back out though.
User avatar
3958v
Posts: 543
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 12:00 am

Re: 170A VS. 170B

Post by 3958v »

I still would not pass over a really nice A model as the condition of the plane is way more important than the model year 170 you get. In our area there are no airports that would pose a problem for any 170. I was looking for a 170B when I found a nice 48 and I have no regrets 18 years latter. Unless something happens to my present 170 I will never have a B model as my ragwing takes me everywhere I need to go. Bill K
Polished 48 170 Cat 22 JD 620 & Pug
User avatar
canav8
Posts: 1006
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 2:34 pm

Re: 170A VS. 170B

Post by canav8 »

lovetaildraggers wrote:Correction: I said shorter take off distance but after reading it again, I imagine that he ment getting into shorter runways with the larger flaps or perhaps, both. I guess the main things is getting back out though.
The truth is you can get into anything short with any model of 170. Getting out is a whole another story! D
52' C-170B N2713D Ser #25255
Doug
Post Reply