I hear you Dave. Thank goodness the 170 has none of those shortcomings! Just pre-flight, push the starter, and enjoy. I fully believe I'll end my flying with the 170..........in 30 or 40 years.
Richard
Some things just ain't right...
Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher
-
- Posts: 3481
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 6:05 pm
-
- Posts: 3481
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 6:05 pm
Dave- I just remembered, Cessna did make one prototype in the early 1950s from a 195 called the XP-210 that was a 195 airframe with the barn door flaps, square 180-like tail, squared wing tips, and a Continental O-470. It wasn't a bad looking airplane, I have a picture of it. That prototype might have been what convinced Cessna to go ahead and make the 180 from scratch.
I bet the success of the 170 showed Cessna they could make a lighter, higher horsepower plane (180) based on the design of the 170 which was much lighter and probably performed much better than the XP-210, plus it had a much more modern look to it. The final straw was probably the 180 was MUCH cheaper to produce.
Richard
I bet the success of the 170 showed Cessna they could make a lighter, higher horsepower plane (180) based on the design of the 170 which was much lighter and probably performed much better than the XP-210, plus it had a much more modern look to it. The final straw was probably the 180 was MUCH cheaper to produce.
Richard
Last edited by hilltop170 on Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Richard Pulley
2014-2016 TIC170A Past President
1951 170A, N1715D, s/n 20158, O-300D
Owned from 1973 to 1984.
Bought again in 2006 after 22 years.
It's not for sale!
2014-2016 TIC170A Past President
1951 170A, N1715D, s/n 20158, O-300D
Owned from 1973 to 1984.
Bought again in 2006 after 22 years.
It's not for sale!
-
- Posts: 894
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 6:25 pm
Yep, and here we arehilltop170 wrote:Dave- I just remembered, Cessna did make one prototype in the early 1950s from a 195 called the XP-210 that was a 195 airframe with the barn door flaps, square 180-like tail, and a Continental O-470. It wasn't a bad looking airplane, I have a picture of it. That prototype might have been what convinced Cessna to go ahead and make the 180 from scratch.
I bet the success of the 170 showed Cessna they could make a lighter, higher horsepower plane (180) based on the design of the 170 which was much lighter and probably performed much better than the XP-210, plus it had a much more modern look to it. The final straw was probably the 180 was MUCH cheaper to produce.
Richard
Dave
N92CP ("Clark's Plane")
1953 C-180
N92CP ("Clark's Plane")
1953 C-180