Fixed gear has certain advantages.

A place to relax and discuss flying topics.

Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher

Post Reply
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21004
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Fixed gear has certain advantages.

Post by GAHorn »

'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
User avatar
flat country pilot
Posts: 230
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 1:46 pm

Post by flat country pilot »

That looks real expensive :cry: How does the military deal with the pilot?

Bill
Flat Country Pilot
Farm Field PVT
54 C170B
User avatar
thammer
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 5:07 am

Post by thammer »

flat country pilot wrote:That looks real expensive :cry: How does the military deal with the pilot?

Bill
Have you heard where "decimation" originated? When the Roman troops screwed up in battle the general lined them up and every 10th ("deci") was killed by the guys next to him. Similar thing here but since there only two pilots, maybe the flight engineer gets to whack them both. :wink: Though he should have been screaming like a girl when they forgot the gear. Hmm... maybe he was and they ignored the gear warning thinking it was him.

More seriously, I have no idea, but it makes a good story. Saw it on a history channel show once.
doug8082a
Posts: 1373
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 2:06 am

Post by doug8082a »

Well that certainly looks like a CEM (Career Ending Maneuver)... :roll:
Doug
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21004
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Post by GAHorn »

flat country pilot wrote:That looks real expensive :cry: ....

Bill
Yep. Guess who gets to pay for that. :roll:
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
User avatar
tshort
Posts: 223
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 9:45 pm

Post by tshort »

I guess I better work a couple extra shifts this month ... 8O 8O

T.
Thomas Short
1948 C170 N3949V
RV-8 wings in progress
Indianapolis (KUMP)
4-Shipp
Posts: 434
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 11:31 pm

"Career Check Complete"

Post by 4-Shipp »

Somehting I learned from a fellow T-37 IP:

"Gear down, cleared to land...career check complete" 8O
Bruce Shipp
former owners of N49CP, '53 C170B
User avatar
Bill Hart
Posts: 455
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 2:04 pm

Post by Bill Hart »

I am not so sure that it was a gear handle malfunction. In the photos it appears that they blew the gear down with the nitrogen bottle not a normal gear extension.

As to the pilots there are 2 boards that would meet one is the safety board and the other a flight evaluation board. The safety board will try and figure out what happened the FEB will recommend action against the pilots.
CraigH
Posts: 259
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 11:55 pm

Post by CraigH »

According to this report, the cause of the accident was determined to be "pilot error:

http://aero-news.net/news/military.cfm? ... litary.cfm
Craig Helm
Graham, TX (KRPH)
2000 RV-4
ex-owner 1956 Cessna 170B N3477D, now CF-DLR
User avatar
N2255D
Posts: 489
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2002 3:42 am

Post by N2255D »

Don't think B1 has an Engineer.
Walt Weaver
Spencer Airport (NC35)
Pavewlc
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 1:03 am

Post by Pavewlc »

It what happens when you keep sending folks on 12+ hour missions into combat zones day after day.
I don't know anything about this mishap other than it occured after a "very long mission at a forward location", but maybe "doing more with less" has not been such a good idea since it has resulted in "doing more with less people". My 2 cents...

Lee
Lee Collins
1951 C170A
N1733D
User avatar
Bill Hart
Posts: 455
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 2:04 pm

Post by Bill Hart »

Pavewlc wrote:It what happens when you keep sending folks on 12+ hour missions into combat zones day after day.
I don't know anything about this mishap other than it occured after a "very long mission at a forward location", but maybe "doing more with less" has not been such a good idea since it has resulted in "doing more with less people". My 2 cents...

Lee

AMEN!
Post Reply