Vor V-Shaped Tail Antenna Physics

How to keep the Cessna 170 flying and airworthy.

Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher

User avatar
Jim Collins
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2017 1:34 pm

Re: Vor V-Shaped Tail Antenna Physics

Post by Jim Collins »

Gary,
I'll try to explain. As mentioned in the beginning of this message stream, the the purpose of the Balun is to help electrically match the antenna (which is a balance load because both sides are the same) to the coax cable (which is not a balanced load). The name "Balun" is the two words "Balanced" and "UnBalanced" combined to make one word. The idea of using a Balun on the airplane is that the net effect is that it helps the antenna receive better in all directions when mounted on the airplane. IS THIS REALLY NEEDED?? Probably not if using a newer solid state radio because the VOR receivers are normally more than sensitive enough to pick up signals while in the air but if using an older radio, the Balun might be needed to give the radio a little higher signal strength in all directions.

So how does the Balun do its job? On the antenna side of the Balun (Balanced section) the two leads are driven 180 degrees apart by the loop section of the Balun. The loop is 1/4 wave down and then 1/4 wave up to give a total delay (phase rotation) of 1/2 wave (or 180 degrees). The actual physical length of the loop is reduced by about 20% because the signals inside of the coax are slowed down by that much. The net effect acts sort of like a transformer in that the unbalanced coax cable coming from the radio is transformed from a unbalanced load to a balanced load and one side is rotated 180 degrees and then connected to the antenna. If I had a blackboard and you where here, I think I could do a much better job of explaining. By the way, I think in your 3rd drawing, there is a type-o. I am not sure the 3rd drawing would work. I used the 4th drawing because that was what was in the airplane originally and it is easier to make because you do not have to solder at the bottom of the loop.

Jim Collins
User avatar
Bruce Fenstermacher
Posts: 10313
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 11:24 am

Re: Vor V-Shaped Tail Antenna Physics

Post by Bruce Fenstermacher »

Jim, you did a fantastic job with that explanation. :cry:
CAUTION - My forum posts may be worth what you paid for them!

Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
User avatar
n2582d
Posts: 2808
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 4:58 am

Re: Vor V-Shaped Tail Antenna Physics

Post by n2582d »

Jim,
Thanks for the explanation.
Jim Collins wrote:By the way, I think in your 3rd drawing, there is a type-o. I am not sure the 3rd drawing would work.
By the explanation and pictures Bob Nuckolls gives in the Aero Electric link on the last page I don't think the 3rd drawing is a typo. In fact he says,
Understand that this BALUN puts a DC dead short across the end of your receiver's feedline coax so don't be alarmed if you put the ohmmeter or continuity tester to this piece of coax and it tests "shorted".
How that works with a dead short is beyond me.
Gary
User avatar
DaveF
Posts: 1516
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 1:44 am

Re: Vor V-Shaped Tail Antenna Physics

Post by DaveF »

n2582d wrote: How that works with a dead short is beyond me.
That's because a dead short at the end of a quarter-wave-long piece of coaxial cable "looks" like an open circuit at the driving end. An electromagnetic wave arriving at a short circuit is forced to be all current and zero voltage. But the wave energy reflects back up the cable (because there's nothing to absorb it), and after traveling back a quarter wave has shifted in phase by 90 degrees to be all voltage and no current. It's a sine wave, which goes from peak to zero or zero to peak in 90 degrees. So the driver "sees" an open circuit, same as if the stub of coax wasn't there.
User avatar
DaveF
Posts: 1516
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 1:44 am

Re: Vor V-Shaped Tail Antenna Physics

Post by DaveF »

Jim Collins wrote:Thanks to all,
I got the VOR antenna fixed. I had to take off the rudder and then take off the Vertical stabilizer cap. I found the Balun's weight was hanging off of the antenna connection and after all the years it fatigued and broke off. So nothing was connected to the antennas. I made a new Balun with fresh coax cable and reconnected everything and now (according to my antenna meter) it works just like new. The Balun that was in the plane was a little different from the others shown in this message stream but it works just the same and is a little easier to make. The loop section is 1/4 wave long which equals about 50cm. Photo below
Jim, that's not the right balun to use. What you have is called a "4:1 half-wave coax balun", and causes impedance mismatch between the antenna and feedline. It acts as a voltage doubler, and transforms the apparent antenna impedance down by a factor of 4. We really want a 1:1 balun because a dipole is a good-enough match to a 50 ohm line.

But in this application it doesn't really matter, because we have a great surplus of received power and a good receiver, so your VOR will work. Arguably, we don't really need a balun at all. It's really a requirement for transmitters, where we care about return currents flowing on the feedline shield and reflected power.

I got around all this by installing an antenna with a built-in broadband balun, which works better than any tuned coax balun.
User avatar
n2582d
Posts: 2808
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 4:58 am

Re: Vor V-Shaped Tail Antenna Physics

Post by n2582d »

DaveF wrote:
n2582d wrote: How that works with a dead short is beyond me.
That's because a dead short at the end of a quarter-wave-long piece of coaxial cable "looks" like an open circuit at the driving end. An electromagnetic wave arriving at a short circuit is forced to be all current and zero voltage. But the wave energy reflects back up the cable (because there's nothing to absorb it), and after traveling back a quarter wave has shifted in phase by 90 degrees to be all voltage and no current. It's a sine wave, which goes from peak to zero or zero to peak in 90 degrees. So the driver "sees" an open circuit, same as if the stub of coax wasn't there.
We're not going to be tested on this, are we? :lol:
Gary
User avatar
johneeb
Posts: 1520
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 2:44 am

Re: Vor V-Shaped Tail Antenna Physics

Post by johneeb »

Gary, sence you read this far you passed the test! :D
Last edited by johneeb on Fri Jul 20, 2018 10:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
John E. Barrett
aka. Johneb

Sent from my "Cray Super Computer"
User avatar
Jim Collins
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2017 1:34 pm

Re: Vor V-Shaped Tail Antenna Physics

Post by Jim Collins »

Dave F, Thank you. I looked closer at the Balun that came with my plane and that I duplicated and you are right. The voltage does get doubled and that changes the impedance by a factor of 4 (Bummer). I might have been better off not using one at all. With all of the trouble I went through taking the rudder apart to fit it, I am not about to take it apart again to fix it again. Anyway, I found during my test flights that my VOR range is over 100 miles, so I am not too worried. I think my advice to others would be not to use a Balun at all and just simply connect the coax right to the antenna and be done with it. Also,to add a strain relief at the end of the cable to prevent future breakage (which I did).
Post Reply